Generic Measurement Best Practice

The general principles of best practice in dimensional metrology are very clearly defined and well documented by:-

The importance of considering accuracy  when deciding whether a measurement proves that something is within specification is set out in:-

Estimation of Measurement Uncertainty

The following link gives a simple explanation of what measurement uncertainty is and why it is important.

One-Dimensional Measurements

The best practices for uncertainty estimation of 1D measurements are documented by:-

Coordinate Measurements

Uncertainty estimation, calibration and verification for coordinate measurements does not currently have such clearly defined best practice.

The following standards cover verification tests for specific instruments. Although they separate some of the major sub-systems they do not provide full estimations of uncertainty parameters:-

State of the art methods are being developed by NIST/NPL/PTB which will provide full rigorous uncertainty evaluation for coordinate measurements. These include:-

The generic approach is to create a model of the uncertainty parameters for the instrument and then best fit measurements to reference coordinates while optimizing the uncertainty parameters. The fundamental mathematics  and application of this approach are documented in publications by Forbes et al.

Use of Specific Instruments

Training and guidance for specific instruments tends to be provided by vendors focusing on how to 'drive' the instruments. There is a gap between generic best practice and specific instrument guidance. Large users such as aerospace companies have their own guidelines but there is a need to consolidate this. 

Integrated Metrology Applications

In a number of metrology application areas there is very little established best practice. For example:-

These are areas in which Jody Muelaner is engaged in active research.