Measurement Assisted Assembly and the Roadmap to Part-To-Part Assembly

Authors

J.E. Muelaner1, A. Kayani2, O. Martin1, and P.G. Maropoulos1

Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Bath, Bath, UK

Airbus UK

Published in

Proceedings of DET2011

7th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology

2011. Athens, Greece. p. 11-19

Abstract

Cycle times and production costs remain high in aerospace assembly processes largely due to extensive reworking within the assembly jig. Other industries replaced these craft based processes with part-to-part assembly facilitated by interchangeable parts. Due to very demanding interface tolerances and large flexible components it has not been possible to achieve the required interchangeability tolerances for most aerospace structures. Measurement assisted assembly processes can however deliver many of the advantages of part-to-part assembly without requiring interchangeable parts. This paper reviews assembly concepts such as interface management, oneway assembly, interchangeability, part-to-part assembly, jigless assembly and determinate assembly. The relationship between these processes is then detailed and they are organized into a roadmap leading to part-to-part assembly.

Download

References

  1. Bullen, G. N. (1997). "The Mechanization / Automation of Major Aircraft Assembly Tools." Production and Inventory Management Journal: 84-87.
  2. Calawa, R., S. Smith, I. Moore and T. Jackson (2004). HAWDE Five Axis Wing Surface Drilling Machine. Aerospace Manufacturing and Automated Fastening Conference and Exhibition. St. Louis, Missouri, USA, SAE International.
  3. Hempstead, B., B. Thayer and S. Williams (2006). Composite Automatic Wing Drilling Equipment (CAWDE). Aerospace Manufacturing and Automated Fastening Conference and Exhibition. Toulouse, France, SAE International: 1-5.
  4. Hogan, S., J. Hartmann, B. Thayer, J. Brown, I. Moore, J. Rowe and M. Burrows (2003). Automated Wing Drilling System for the A380-GRAWDE. SAE Aerospace Automated Fastening Conference and Exhibition - 2003 Aerospace Congress and Exhibition. Montreal, Canada, SAE International. 112: 1-8.
  5. Kayani, A. and I. Gray (2009). Shim for Arrangement Against a Structural Component and a Method of Making a Shim, Airbus UK Ltd.
  6. Kayani, A. and J. Jamshidi (2007). Measurement Assisted Assembly For Large Volume Aircraft Wing Structures. 4th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology. P. G. Maropoulos. Bath, United Kingdom: 426-434.
  7. Kihlman, H. (2002). Affordable Reconfigurable Assembly Tooling - An Aircraft Development and Manufacturing Perspective. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Linköping, Linköping Universitet: 111.
  8. Kihlman, H. (2005). Affordable Automation for Airframe Assembly. Department of Mechanical Engineering. Linköping, Linköpings Universitet: 286.
  9. Mitra, N. J., N. Gelfand, H. Pottmann and L. Guibas (2004). Registration of point cloud data from a geometric optimization perspective. Eurographics/ACM SIGGRAPH symposium on Geometry processing, Nice, France.
  10. Muelaner, J. E., A. Kayani and P. Maropoulos (2011). Measurement Assisted Fettling of Rib Feet to Maintain Cover Interface on the ALCAS Wing Box Demonstrator. SAE 2011 Aerotech Congress & Exposition. Toulouse, France, SAE.
  11. Muelaner, J. E. and P. G. Maropoulos (2008). Large Scale Metrology in Aerospace Assembly, Nantes, France.
  12. Muelaner, J. E. and P. G. Maropoulos (2010). "Design for Measurement Assisted Determinate Assembly (MADA) of Large Composite Structures." Journal of the CMSC 5(2): 18-25.
  13. Pickett, N., S. Eastwood, P. Webb, N. Gindy, D. Vaughan and J. Moore (1999). A Framework to Support Component Design in Jigless Manufacturing. Aerospace Manufacturing Technology Conference & Exposition. Bellevue, Washington, SAE International: 1-4.
  14. Summers, M. (2005). Robot Capability Test and Development of Industrial Robot Positioning System for the Aerospace Industry. AeroTech Congress & Exhibition. Grapevine,Texas, SAE International: 1-13.